The scientific consensus is clear: climate change is here. And so is demand from investors seeking to help through lessening their carbon exposures. Intech and other signatories of the Net Zero Asset Managers Initiative intend to increase the proportion of assets managed in line with efforts to reach net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, among other advocacy groups attempting to shift institutional investing in the direction of sustainability.
An asset manager’s primary objective is still, in most cases, to help you address investment challenges, not climate challenges.While that mission may not feel as existential as global climate change, it’s still necessary for the continued solvency of institutional assets. Unfortunately, some important investment solutions of our day, such as defensive, low volatility equity strategies, may appear objectionable to climate-minded investors.
Two imperatives of our day – decarbonizing and de-risking – appear to be on a collision course. Can you reconcile these objectives? What are the trade-offs?
The climate change urgency intensifies each year, with rising greenhouse gas emissions contributing to the earth’s higher average surface temperature. We recorded one of the warmest years on record in 2020 – more than 1.2° Celsius (2° Fahrenheit) higher than in 1880 (see chart below).1
Paleoclimatology tells us that the earth’s temperature has been relatively stable, but since the dawn of industrialization, the atmospheric concentration of greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide has been rising as we burn fossil fuels such as coal, oil, and natural gas.2 These pollutants absorb sunlight and solar radiation that would typically bounce off the earth and into space, trapping the heat and warming the planet.
If we continue to see an unabated rise in greenhouse emissions, extreme weather events and rising sea levels will persist, which have had and will continue to have widespread economic consequences.
With bond yields at all-time lows and allocations to less-liquid alternatives already high, equities’ role in helping fund and pay future liabilities, or grow participant savings balances, is increasingly crucial. Unfortunately, unprecedented uncertainty at today’s lofty market levels makes it increasingly difficult for investors to stay the course with equity-dominated portfolios.
Rather than reducing equity allocations, some investors are seizing the opportunity to de-risk them. By replacing part of your core equity holding with a defensive, low volatility strategy, you have the potential to reduce overall portfolio volatility and mitigate drawdowns while at the same time preserving long-term return expectations and portfolio liquidity.
Derivatives’ DrawbacksIf you assume traditional low volatility equity strategies have to be high carbon portfolios, why not instead turn to derivatives as a means of defensive equity investing? Derivative strategies, such as purchasing a put option, a put-spread, or a zero-cost collar, are akin to buying fire insurance for your house. The policy may be replete with caveats and generally doesn’t pay off until your home has burned to the ground. Instead, low volatility strategies help prevent your house from burning down in the first place – they act more like fire-retardant materials, attempting to add a layer of resiliency against a potential fire. They should be included as foundational elements when constructing an equity allocation. What’s more, derivative approaches have performance costs that can rise rapidly in proportion to market volatility, timing precision, and willingness to roll the strategy forward. In contrast, low volatility strategies may lag the general market in some periods, but over the long-term have historically offered market-like returns. They also have predictable, asset-based fees that are typically lower than most traditional active-risk strategies. |
The illustrations below make a simple, cyclical case for low volatility investing. Low volatility equities have historically offered market-like returns with a quarter less volatility than a cap-weighted benchmark, allowing for better compounding over time. But the recent market environment has led to record under-performance for low volatility investing. That makes allocations to defensive equity especially compelling today.
Low carbon and low volatility investing are seemingly incompatible visions, especially if you tie the benefits of low volatility investing to holding low volatility stocks. Through that lens, low volatility investing might produce a portfolio of very high carbon emitters, underscored by a significant overweight to the utilities sector.
S&P helps illustrate this perceived problem, since they employ a stock-driven approach to creating the S&P 500 Low Volatility Index. The Index selects the least volatile stocks and weights them in inverse proportion to that same metric. Consequently, relative to the S&P 500 Index, the S&P 500 Low Volatility Index has a 17% overweight to utilities – the largest overweight of any sector, in the sector with the highest relative carbon intensity. At the same time, it significantly underweights sectors with low relative carbon intensity (see below).
The apparent positioning of this heuristic-based low volatility index may see to be in direct conflict with low carbon. It’s understandable if this seems par for the course; given the long bull market, many investors haven’t seriously examined low volatility investing lately. But there is a better way. To see how a different approach to low volatility makes it possible to surmount this obstacle, download our latest brief eBook, “Low Vol Investing on a Low Carb(on) Diet.”
1. 2020 Tied for Warmest Year on Record, NASA Analysis Shows. (2021). Retrieved 14 October 2021, from https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/2020-tied-for-warmest-year-on-record-nasa-analysis-shows
2. USGCRP, 2017: Climate Science Special Report: Fourth National Climate Assessment, Volume I [Wuebbles, D.J., D.W. Fahey, K.A. Hibbard, D.J. Dokken, B.C. Stewart, and T.K. Maycock (eds.)]. U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington, DC, USA, 470 pp, doi: 10.7930/J0J964J6
Note to All Readers: For institutional/ sophisticated investors / qualified distributors use only. Not for public viewing or distribution.
This information is issued by Intech Investment Management LLC (Intech) and is intended solely for the use of wholesale clients, as defined in section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and is not for general public distribution. Intech is permitted to provide certain financial services to wholesale clients pursuant to an exemption from the need to hold an Australian financial services license under the Corporations Act 2001. Intech is regulated by the United States Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC) under U.S. laws, which differ from Australian laws. By receiving this information, you represent that you are a wholesale client.
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. This document does not constitute and should not be construed as investment, legal or tax advice or a recommendation, solicitation or opinion regarding the merits of any investments. Nothing in the document shall be deemed to be a direct or indirect provision of investment management services or an offer for securities by Janus Henderson Investors and its subsidiaries (“Janus Henderson”) and is not considered specific to any client requirements. Anything non-factual in nature is an opinion of the author(s), and opinions are meant as an illustration of broader themes, are not an indication of trading intent, and are subject to change at any time due to changes in market or economic conditions. Janus Henderson is not responsible for any unlawful distribution of this document to any third parties, in whole or in part, or for information reconstructed from this document and do not guarantee that the information supplied is accurate, complete, or timely, or make any warranties with regards to the results obtained from its use. It is not intended to indicate or imply that current or past results are indicative of future profitability or expectations. As with all investments, there are inherent risks that need to be addressed.
The distribution of this document or the information contained in it may be restricted by law and may not be used in any jurisdiction or any circumstances in which its use would be unlawful. This presentation is being provided on a confidential basis solely for the information of those persons to whom it is given. Should the intermediary wish to pass on this document or the information contained in it to any third party, it is the responsibility of the intermediary to investigate the extent to which this is permissible under relevant law, and to comply with all such law.
This presentation is strictly private and confidential and may not be reproduced or used for any purpose other than evaluation of a potential investment in Janus Capital International Limited’s products or the procurement of its services by the recipient of this presentation or provided to any person or entity other than the recipient of this presentation. We may record telephone calls for our mutual protection, to improve customer service and for regulatory record keeping purposes.
Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. There is no assurance that the investment process will consistently lead to successful investing.
The index returns are provided to represent the investment environment existing during the time periods shown. For comparison purposes, the index is fully invested, which includes the reinvestment of dividends and capital gains. The returns for the index do not include any transaction costs, management fees, or other costs. Composition of each individual portfolio may differ from the securities in the corresponding benchmark index. The index is used as a performance benchmark only, as Janus does not attempt to replicate an index. Because Janus’ sector weightings are a residual of portfolio construction, significant differences between sector weightings in client portfolios and the index are common.
The opinions are those of the authors and are subject to change at any time due to changes in market or economic conditions. The comments should not be construed as investment advice or a recommendation of individual holdings or market sectors, but as an illustration of broader themes.
There is a risk/reward tradeoff that comes with investing in defensive equity strategies. These risk strategies are likely to underperform the index during periods of strong up markets and may not achieve the desired level of protection in down markets.
Data source is Intech throughout unless otherwise indicated.
Intech Investment Management LLC will act as sub-adviser to Janus Capital International Limited.
Janus Henderson Investors US LLC serves as investment adviser. Janus Henderson, Janus, Henderson, Perkins, Intech, VelocityShares, Knowledge. Shared and Knowledge Labs are trademarks of Janus Henderson Group plc or one of its subsidiaries. © Janus Henderson Group plc. For more information or to locate your country’s representative contact information, please visit www.janushenderson.com.
MSCI makes no express or implied warranties or representations and shall have no liability whatsoever with respect to any MSCI data contained herein, if shown. The MSCI data may not be further redistributed or used as a basis for other indices or any securities or financial products. This material has not been approved, reviewed, or produced by MSCI.
S&P 500 Dow Jones Indices LLC and/or its affiliates make no express or implied warranties or representations and shall have no liability whatsoever with respect to any S&P data contained herein. The S&P data has been licensed for use by Intech and may not be further redistributed or used as a basis for other indices or any securities or financial products. This material has not been approved, reviewed, or produced by S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC. For more information on any of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC's indices, please visit www.spdji.com.